Review



human dbp  (Elabscience Biotechnology)


Bioz Verified Symbol Elabscience Biotechnology is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Elabscience Biotechnology manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 93
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Elabscience Biotechnology human dbp
    Human Dbp, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 3 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human dbp/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
    Average 93 stars, based on 3 article reviews
    human dbp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    rabbit anti human polyclonal dbp  (Bioss)
    95
    Bioss rabbit anti human polyclonal dbp
    Rabbit Anti Human Polyclonal Dbp, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti human polyclonal dbp/product/Bioss
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti human polyclonal dbp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    95/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    dbp polyclonal antibody  (Cusabio)
    94
    Cusabio dbp polyclonal antibody
    Dbp Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Cusabio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dbp polyclonal antibody/product/Cusabio
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dbp polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    human dbp  (Elabscience Biotechnology)
    93
    Elabscience Biotechnology human dbp
    Human Dbp, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human dbp/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human dbp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    93/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    human vitamin dbp immunoassay quantikine elisa  (R&D Systems)
    92
    R&D Systems human vitamin dbp immunoassay quantikine elisa
    Mean concentrations of free calcidiol in the whole sample and the study groups in late winter, in total and by gender. Whole sample: 326 individuals, 161 males and 165 females. Osteoporosis: 99 individuals, 24 males and 75 females. Type 1 diabetes: 53 individuals, 27 males and 26 females. Type 2 diabetes: 51 individuals, 40 males and 11 females. Athletic healthy: 123 individuals, 70 males and 53 females. Free calcidiol was measured by <t>ELISA.</t> Males had significantly greater mean concentration than females in whole sample (p < 0.001) and osteoporosis (p = 0.030), with mild correlations. In total, osteoporosis had a significantly lower mean concentration than type 1 & 2 diabetes, and athletic healthy (p <0.001 in all cases), with very strong correlations. Type 1 & 2 diabetes had a significantly lower mean concentration than athletic healthy (p = 0.017, p = 0.011), with very strong correlations. *: A statistically significant difference. O: Osteoporosis, 1: Type 1 diabetes, 2: Type 2 diabetes, A: Athletic healthy.
    Human Vitamin Dbp Immunoassay Quantikine Elisa, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human vitamin dbp immunoassay quantikine elisa/product/R&D Systems
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human vitamin dbp immunoassay quantikine elisa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    92/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    dbp antibodies  (R&D Systems)
    94
    R&D Systems dbp antibodies
    Mean concentrations of free calcidiol in the whole sample and the study groups in late winter, in total and by gender. Whole sample: 326 individuals, 161 males and 165 females. Osteoporosis: 99 individuals, 24 males and 75 females. Type 1 diabetes: 53 individuals, 27 males and 26 females. Type 2 diabetes: 51 individuals, 40 males and 11 females. Athletic healthy: 123 individuals, 70 males and 53 females. Free calcidiol was measured by <t>ELISA.</t> Males had significantly greater mean concentration than females in whole sample (p < 0.001) and osteoporosis (p = 0.030), with mild correlations. In total, osteoporosis had a significantly lower mean concentration than type 1 & 2 diabetes, and athletic healthy (p <0.001 in all cases), with very strong correlations. Type 1 & 2 diabetes had a significantly lower mean concentration than athletic healthy (p = 0.017, p = 0.011), with very strong correlations. *: A statistically significant difference. O: Osteoporosis, 1: Type 1 diabetes, 2: Type 2 diabetes, A: Athletic healthy.
    Dbp Antibodies, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dbp antibodies/product/R&D Systems
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dbp antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    dbp  (R&D Systems)
    94
    R&D Systems dbp
    Mean concentrations of free calcidiol in the whole sample and the study groups in late winter, in total and by gender. Whole sample: 326 individuals, 161 males and 165 females. Osteoporosis: 99 individuals, 24 males and 75 females. Type 1 diabetes: 53 individuals, 27 males and 26 females. Type 2 diabetes: 51 individuals, 40 males and 11 females. Athletic healthy: 123 individuals, 70 males and 53 females. Free calcidiol was measured by <t>ELISA.</t> Males had significantly greater mean concentration than females in whole sample (p < 0.001) and osteoporosis (p = 0.030), with mild correlations. In total, osteoporosis had a significantly lower mean concentration than type 1 & 2 diabetes, and athletic healthy (p <0.001 in all cases), with very strong correlations. Type 1 & 2 diabetes had a significantly lower mean concentration than athletic healthy (p = 0.017, p = 0.011), with very strong correlations. *: A statistically significant difference. O: Osteoporosis, 1: Type 1 diabetes, 2: Type 2 diabetes, A: Athletic healthy.
    Dbp, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dbp/product/R&D Systems
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dbp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Mean concentrations of free calcidiol in the whole sample and the study groups in late winter, in total and by gender. Whole sample: 326 individuals, 161 males and 165 females. Osteoporosis: 99 individuals, 24 males and 75 females. Type 1 diabetes: 53 individuals, 27 males and 26 females. Type 2 diabetes: 51 individuals, 40 males and 11 females. Athletic healthy: 123 individuals, 70 males and 53 females. Free calcidiol was measured by ELISA. Males had significantly greater mean concentration than females in whole sample (p < 0.001) and osteoporosis (p = 0.030), with mild correlations. In total, osteoporosis had a significantly lower mean concentration than type 1 & 2 diabetes, and athletic healthy (p <0.001 in all cases), with very strong correlations. Type 1 & 2 diabetes had a significantly lower mean concentration than athletic healthy (p = 0.017, p = 0.011), with very strong correlations. *: A statistically significant difference. O: Osteoporosis, 1: Type 1 diabetes, 2: Type 2 diabetes, A: Athletic healthy.

    Journal: Reports of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

    Article Title: Vitamin D Binding Protein (DBP), Free Calcidiol, and Total Calcitriol in Adults from Northern Greece

    doi: 10.61186/rbmb.12.4.652

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Mean concentrations of free calcidiol in the whole sample and the study groups in late winter, in total and by gender. Whole sample: 326 individuals, 161 males and 165 females. Osteoporosis: 99 individuals, 24 males and 75 females. Type 1 diabetes: 53 individuals, 27 males and 26 females. Type 2 diabetes: 51 individuals, 40 males and 11 females. Athletic healthy: 123 individuals, 70 males and 53 females. Free calcidiol was measured by ELISA. Males had significantly greater mean concentration than females in whole sample (p < 0.001) and osteoporosis (p = 0.030), with mild correlations. In total, osteoporosis had a significantly lower mean concentration than type 1 & 2 diabetes, and athletic healthy (p <0.001 in all cases), with very strong correlations. Type 1 & 2 diabetes had a significantly lower mean concentration than athletic healthy (p = 0.017, p = 0.011), with very strong correlations. *: A statistically significant difference. O: Osteoporosis, 1: Type 1 diabetes, 2: Type 2 diabetes, A: Athletic healthy.

    Article Snippet: At the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, IHU, we measured free calcidiol, total calcitriol, and DBP concentrations, using commercial immunoenzymatic kits: Free 25OH Vitamin D ELISA (Immuno‐Biological Laboratories Inc., USA) for free calcidiol, 1,25(OH)2 Vitamin D ELISA (DIAsource ImmunoAssays, Belgium) for total calcitriol, and Human Vitamin DBP Immunoassay Quantikine® ELISA (China R&D Systems Ltd., China) for DBP, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Concentration Assay

    Mean concentrations of total calcitriol in the whole sample and the study groups in late winter, in total and by gender. Whole sample: 326 individuals, 161 males and 165 females. Osteoporosis: 99 individuals, 24 males and 75 females. Type 1 diabetes: 53 individuals, 27 males and 26 females. Type 2 diabetes: 51 individuals, 40 males and 11 females. Athletic healthy: 123 individuals, 70 males and 53 females. Total calcitriol was measured by ELISA. In type 2 diabetes, females had a significantly greater mean concentration than males (p < 0.001) with a strong correlation. In total, osteoporotics had a significantly lower concentration than type 1 diabetics (p = 0.030) and athletic healthy (p = 0.037) with weak correlations. *: A statistically significant difference. O: Osteoporosis, 1: Type 1 diabetes, A: Athletic healthy.

    Journal: Reports of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

    Article Title: Vitamin D Binding Protein (DBP), Free Calcidiol, and Total Calcitriol in Adults from Northern Greece

    doi: 10.61186/rbmb.12.4.652

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Mean concentrations of total calcitriol in the whole sample and the study groups in late winter, in total and by gender. Whole sample: 326 individuals, 161 males and 165 females. Osteoporosis: 99 individuals, 24 males and 75 females. Type 1 diabetes: 53 individuals, 27 males and 26 females. Type 2 diabetes: 51 individuals, 40 males and 11 females. Athletic healthy: 123 individuals, 70 males and 53 females. Total calcitriol was measured by ELISA. In type 2 diabetes, females had a significantly greater mean concentration than males (p < 0.001) with a strong correlation. In total, osteoporotics had a significantly lower concentration than type 1 diabetics (p = 0.030) and athletic healthy (p = 0.037) with weak correlations. *: A statistically significant difference. O: Osteoporosis, 1: Type 1 diabetes, A: Athletic healthy.

    Article Snippet: At the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, IHU, we measured free calcidiol, total calcitriol, and DBP concentrations, using commercial immunoenzymatic kits: Free 25OH Vitamin D ELISA (Immuno‐Biological Laboratories Inc., USA) for free calcidiol, 1,25(OH)2 Vitamin D ELISA (DIAsource ImmunoAssays, Belgium) for total calcitriol, and Human Vitamin DBP Immunoassay Quantikine® ELISA (China R&D Systems Ltd., China) for DBP, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Concentration Assay

    Mean free calcidiol concentrations and the correlations among age subgroups in the whole sample and study groups. Whole sample: Young = 76, middle-aged = 156, elderly = 94. Osteoporosis: Young = 7, middle-aged = 46, elderly = 46. Type 1 diabetes: Young = 34, middle-aged = 18, elderly = 1 (mean concentration not applicable). Type 2 diabetes: Young = 0, middle-aged = 28, elderly = 23. Athletic healthy: Young = 35, middle-aged = 64, elderly = 24. Free calcidiol was measured by ELISA. In the whole sample, the young had a significantly greater mean concentration than the middle-aged (p = 0.004) and the elderly (p < 0,001) with mild correlations. In type 1 diabetes, the young had a significantly greater mean concentration than the middle-aged (p = 0.004) with a strong correlation *: A statistically significant difference.

    Journal: Reports of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

    Article Title: Vitamin D Binding Protein (DBP), Free Calcidiol, and Total Calcitriol in Adults from Northern Greece

    doi: 10.61186/rbmb.12.4.652

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Mean free calcidiol concentrations and the correlations among age subgroups in the whole sample and study groups. Whole sample: Young = 76, middle-aged = 156, elderly = 94. Osteoporosis: Young = 7, middle-aged = 46, elderly = 46. Type 1 diabetes: Young = 34, middle-aged = 18, elderly = 1 (mean concentration not applicable). Type 2 diabetes: Young = 0, middle-aged = 28, elderly = 23. Athletic healthy: Young = 35, middle-aged = 64, elderly = 24. Free calcidiol was measured by ELISA. In the whole sample, the young had a significantly greater mean concentration than the middle-aged (p = 0.004) and the elderly (p < 0,001) with mild correlations. In type 1 diabetes, the young had a significantly greater mean concentration than the middle-aged (p = 0.004) with a strong correlation *: A statistically significant difference.

    Article Snippet: At the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, IHU, we measured free calcidiol, total calcitriol, and DBP concentrations, using commercial immunoenzymatic kits: Free 25OH Vitamin D ELISA (Immuno‐Biological Laboratories Inc., USA) for free calcidiol, 1,25(OH)2 Vitamin D ELISA (DIAsource ImmunoAssays, Belgium) for total calcitriol, and Human Vitamin DBP Immunoassay Quantikine® ELISA (China R&D Systems Ltd., China) for DBP, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Techniques: Concentration Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

    Mean total calcitriol concentrations among age subgroups in the whole sample and study groups. Whole sample: Young = 76, middle-aged = 156, elderly = 94. Osteoporosis: Young = 7, middle-aged = 46, elderly = 46. Type 1 diabetes: Young = 34, middle-aged = 18, elderly = 1 (mean concentration not applicable). Type 2 diabetes: Young = 0, middle-aged = 28, elderly = 23. Athletic healthy: Young = 35, middle-aged = 64, elderly = 24. Total calcitriol was measured by ELISA. In type 2 diabetics, the elderly had a significantly greater mean concentration than the middle-aged (p = 0.006) with a mild to strong correlation. No other correlations were found.

    Journal: Reports of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

    Article Title: Vitamin D Binding Protein (DBP), Free Calcidiol, and Total Calcitriol in Adults from Northern Greece

    doi: 10.61186/rbmb.12.4.652

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Mean total calcitriol concentrations among age subgroups in the whole sample and study groups. Whole sample: Young = 76, middle-aged = 156, elderly = 94. Osteoporosis: Young = 7, middle-aged = 46, elderly = 46. Type 1 diabetes: Young = 34, middle-aged = 18, elderly = 1 (mean concentration not applicable). Type 2 diabetes: Young = 0, middle-aged = 28, elderly = 23. Athletic healthy: Young = 35, middle-aged = 64, elderly = 24. Total calcitriol was measured by ELISA. In type 2 diabetics, the elderly had a significantly greater mean concentration than the middle-aged (p = 0.006) with a mild to strong correlation. No other correlations were found.

    Article Snippet: At the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, IHU, we measured free calcidiol, total calcitriol, and DBP concentrations, using commercial immunoenzymatic kits: Free 25OH Vitamin D ELISA (Immuno‐Biological Laboratories Inc., USA) for free calcidiol, 1,25(OH)2 Vitamin D ELISA (DIAsource ImmunoAssays, Belgium) for total calcitriol, and Human Vitamin DBP Immunoassay Quantikine® ELISA (China R&D Systems Ltd., China) for DBP, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Techniques: Concentration Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

    Free calcidiol and total calcitriol mean concentrations and their correlations in late winter and late summer among the whole of subjects with a second measurement and the study groups. Whole sample: 106 individuals. Osteoporosis: 35 individuals. Diabetes: 20 individuals. Athletic healthy: 51 individuals. Free calcidiol and total calcitriol were measured by ELISA. In osteoporotics, free calcidiol concentration was significantly greater in the winter (p < 0.001) with a strong correlation, whereas total calcitriol concentration was significantly greater in the summer (p = 0.049) with a weak correlation. In diabetics, both free calcidiol and total calcitriol was significantly greater in summer (p = 0.005 with a mild correlation, and p < 0.001 with a strong correlation). In athletic healthy subjects, free calcidiol was significantly greater in summer (p < 0.001) with a strong correlation, whereas total calcitriol was significantly lower in summer (p < 0.001) with a strong correlation. *: A statistically significant difference. W: Winder. S: Summer.

    Journal: Reports of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

    Article Title: Vitamin D Binding Protein (DBP), Free Calcidiol, and Total Calcitriol in Adults from Northern Greece

    doi: 10.61186/rbmb.12.4.652

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Free calcidiol and total calcitriol mean concentrations and their correlations in late winter and late summer among the whole of subjects with a second measurement and the study groups. Whole sample: 106 individuals. Osteoporosis: 35 individuals. Diabetes: 20 individuals. Athletic healthy: 51 individuals. Free calcidiol and total calcitriol were measured by ELISA. In osteoporotics, free calcidiol concentration was significantly greater in the winter (p < 0.001) with a strong correlation, whereas total calcitriol concentration was significantly greater in the summer (p = 0.049) with a weak correlation. In diabetics, both free calcidiol and total calcitriol was significantly greater in summer (p = 0.005 with a mild correlation, and p < 0.001 with a strong correlation). In athletic healthy subjects, free calcidiol was significantly greater in summer (p < 0.001) with a strong correlation, whereas total calcitriol was significantly lower in summer (p < 0.001) with a strong correlation. *: A statistically significant difference. W: Winder. S: Summer.

    Article Snippet: At the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, IHU, we measured free calcidiol, total calcitriol, and DBP concentrations, using commercial immunoenzymatic kits: Free 25OH Vitamin D ELISA (Immuno‐Biological Laboratories Inc., USA) for free calcidiol, 1,25(OH)2 Vitamin D ELISA (DIAsource ImmunoAssays, Belgium) for total calcitriol, and Human Vitamin DBP Immunoassay Quantikine® ELISA (China R&D Systems Ltd., China) for DBP, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Concentration Assay